Earlier this week on Larry King, apparently Michael Moore – the wealthy, independently minded yet publicly financed film producer made an appearance on CNN with Larry King and stated his views per his newest politically slanted venture satirically entitled "Capitalism: A Love Story," that "capitalism has failed."
Mr. Moore has consistently waded into controversial issues with his rather pro-Communistic and big government type views that this country would be better off if only it was under a more socialistic or communistic structure.
As one of those in the top 10% income brackets, I would imagine, he has room to be generous with the fruits of other people’s labors it would appear.
And also has the freedom in this country to do so if he wishes, since I don’t think the IRS or the California Department of Revenue is opposed to voluntary donations or contributions. Neither are most of those that are involved in health care provision for foreigners or indigents in this country, or children who are facing chronic diseases or illnesses.
In fact, most in America get letters on a daily basis from some organization or another, and with pleas on CNN and Fox and the other networks for the politicians future political careers and special intererest groups attempting to gain access to Joe the Citizen’s wallet and income in some form or another.
Even the ludicrous "Do Not Call" lists did not stop the abuse, nor apparently did that great invention that can be used to filter the barrage of commercials on television. And more and more individuals are arriving ten minutes later for a screening such as Mr. Moore’s in order to skip those ads now included prior to the previews even in which most citizens are now paying $8.00 and more a pop to be further propagandized by those in the socialistic blue state of California.
What apparently Mr. Moore is missing is that it isn’t capitalism which has failed at all. It is the federal and state government’s "regressively" instituting socialism contrary to both state and federal constitutions, and courts which are now making decisions based on words not even included within that Constitution.
Or now "progressively" using even foreign law in matters under their review, although that definitely is nothing more than treason, actually, under the actual Law in which they even hold those lofty positions on the Court.
Such as "state interests" (which is communism, actually) or "national security" (also used for propaganda spins on progressively illegal functions and duties which our politicians have usurped for their careers most of all) or "in the interest of public safety" (socialism, since now we are criminalizing not simply actions based on proveable losses, but also things such as free expression and speech protections branded now somehow a crime of intent, no matter how factually true some of those statements or positions may be).
And the biggest error of ommision on Mr. Moore’s positions is that what has lead to this has actually also been "state created" in affording the creation of another party to our Constitution in the form of "corporate personhood" way back when, and then the "progressively" regressive than also judicial allowances of even now Bill of Rights protections to these huge, meganational and global interests under our Constitution, even going so far as to protect a globally based conglomerate such as AIG (domiciled in London, not the U.S. at all) at the American taxpayers now expense.
His ideas of "progress" are actually everything the founders fought against and is nothing more than regression.
The power these corporations have gained have been facilitated by both political parties, which he also was clearly making a partisan statement branding it the "conservatives" who are behind this corporatization of America, and outsourcing. Mr. Obama, remember, fired those GM workers in his former home state of Michigan and entered into a joint venture with the big business unions that also did not truly represent those GM workers, but their own pension plans and self-interests. And Washington has protected those Canadian and Mexico City GM workers, while giving the pink slip to all those middle class Americans.
I guess there isn’t any need for a Congressional committee or witch hunt in order to filter out those who were raised by those "social Democrats and Republicans" progressives (regressives, actually, in point of fact) that hold with loyalties and political philosophies that are nothing more than world government socialism at its root.
It appears that the tea baggers are also woefully misled in their approach also insofar as taxation and just who is behind it rather than the Federal Reserve and those in Washington.
The British bought our bank in 1913. And gained America back without firing a shot. And the East India Company lives now once again in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and its global members, along with those corporate interests affiliated with the Council on Foreign Relations in New York.
And the U.N. progressively (or regressively) also having more and more influence over national and state issues in America, without the consent of the governed.
The title of his film apparently is another spin.
What it should be titled is "Globalism: A Love Story,"
But fiction and fantasy are, after all, a part of the entire culture in the Golden State, that is now losing more citizens than it gains also "progressively" (regressively) due to positions and spin doctoring such as Mr. Moore’s new "art" venture.
I wonder if he was on the British bankers’ stimulus money gravy train or many of HIS corporate investors in the making of this film, flooding and depressing now our currency in order to stimulate foreign investment and "globalism" rather than true American free enterprise and "capitalism" as intended by our founders, as a good many in that state appear to have been in the Silicon Valley tech field?
AIG, after all, is a London domiciled global corporation that was bailed out at the Americans expense. And it is these "progresssive" Constitutional violations that have nothing to do with free enterprise or capitalism that has placed this nation and its people now as "servant of the master" London banks who are now quite obviously "sticking it" to the American people for all its worth.
I guess 200 years isn’t too long to hold a grudge, after all, when you value and issue 7/8s of the world’s currency, it doesn’t really matter which "politician" is in office or political party.
And this isn’t capitalism we are speaking of by any definition, although the economic policies of this country were never meant to be purely capitalistic in the sense it is today at all.
There is no competitve market when most of those industries have now been afforded "freedom of association" also and what were meant to be trade associations have also "socialized" major industries due to their price fixing and squeezing out then emerging industries in the process in order to protect their "turf."
And service provider industries such as the insurance and bankings sectors (merely the branches of the global bankers) are reinvesting public monies and assets "on deposit" with them now and diversifying across the board into high risk investments with the fruits of American’s labors with Washington’s now express consent in "progressive" legislation which has occurred under both mainstream political parties whoever is in office.
I mean, if this nation can send a man to the moon, don’t you think that it is capable of making automobile tires that don’t wear out or blow out?
http://www.cnn.com/2009/SHOWBIZ/Movies/09/24/lkl.michael.moore/index.html?eref=igoogle_cnn
Leave Your Comments