Like many young women, Alisha Dean has a racy MySpace page that shows her scantily clad and dancing suggestively. Like countless ladies Alisha Dean lies about her age.
All relatively harmless? Not when Alisha Dean is actually 13– and her sexual relationships land two men in jail for sex with a minor.
Both mean met Alisha Dean online through MySpace, where she said she was "18" and "divorced"– but something seemed off. After Alisha made a few unusual comments, Alisha Dean’s boyfriend Morris Williams had a few questions. He asked her father, Jerry Dean, her age and found out the truth: Alisha Dean is 13– not 19, as she now claimed.
Jerry Dean then pressed charges, and Morris Williams is now serving a year in jail for sleeping with Alisha Dean.
Her previous boyfriend Darwin Mills is serving 5 years.
Alisha Dean’s myspace shows that she is now under fire. She begs: "God Plz Help Me I Need You I’m Goin throgh So Much Shyt N I Can’t Make It. Lord Plz Fight My Battle. HELP ME, REMAKE ME, N RECREATE MY LYFE!!"
It also says that Alisha Dean is 16 years old.
View Comments (4)
There are two sides to every issue. The above article tells the side of the whole age of consent debate that seldom ever gets told.
there is a difference between sex and rape.legal systems should make the distinction and not use the arbitrary information called "age" as the deciding factor in determination of crimes. Does anything get more authoritarian than sex laws? when nature makes someone an adult its inhumane for a state to step in and deny them the natural right to have sex with other physiological adults. The argument of mental development is full of shit industrialist social control. By the logic any age of adults are unfit to decide for themselves who they should be sleeping with. U.S. age of consent laws engineered by states and federal governments,social worker engineering welfare protectionist agencies and industrialist education systems are unconstitutional. The only exception I accept is HIV and seriously injurious std carriers spreading them with intent to do harm to others. If its a crime to fuck earlier than a certain age in on state but not a crime in another thats too much power for states against civil liberty. Ultimately it relies on the fact that people don't have any civil rights until they reach a certain age. but sex/reproduction is by default a natural right not a privilege meted out by governments. Unless its determined to be rape (using physical force/violence not social manipulation) sexual activity with someone who reached adolescence but who is under custody of guardian should be a civil liability at worst. Medical determination of at least female sexual fitness(menstruation) is probably the logical lawmaking path but that arguably puts too much power in the hands of individual medical doctors and the competition of their professions..its still more rational (you can always switch doctors if their holding your cunt hostage by with holding their signature) than arbitrary age prohibitions.
Whats really ridiculous is how by some laws its lawful for kids to fuck each other but not fuck people older than themselves..like how is that just in any way? Like..how is one persons cock or cunt better than anyone else's from a criminal justice perspective?
Part of the problem i think is that the puritanical cultures US states were founded on leaves society with an attitude of sex as an act of harmful aggression by default unless under specific marital/social approved circumstances. Again: I cry foul of civil liberties.