THE KOLIAVERI TRAIT OF DELHI SONIA JUNTA AIDED THE COLOMBO GENOCIDE RAJAPAKSE REGIME TO COMMIT GRAVE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY
The popular ‘kolaiveri’ song (with over 30 million hits) carries the ‘murderous’ or ‘killer’ rage connotation that tempts many to adapt it to lament human sufferings caused by bloodthirsty oppressors. The adapted versions of the ‘kolaiveri’ song are immensely popular with Eelam Tamils who suffer the pain of the Rajapakses’ ‘kolaiveri’ genocide. ‘Kolaiveri’ trait also afflicts the Sonia junta; Sonia UPA/Congress partnered in the Rajapakse ‘kolaiveri’ SL genocide. The two regimes have too much in common; the victims of the Rajapakses’ kolaiveri’ are mainly the Eelam Tamils, now includes the Sinhalese themselves who disapprove the Rajapakses’ dictatorial governance. For the Delhi Sonia junta its kolaiveri victims are the Kashmiris and also the dissenting mainstream Indians and non mafia Congress regimes in the states.
Readers are familiar with the gruesome details on the continuing Rajapakses’ blood thirsty ‘kolaiveri’ genocide on the Eelam Tamils and the Delhi Sonia junta’s ‘in the loop’ association with the Rajapakses’ ‘kolaiveri’ massacres. The ‘kolaiveri’connection explains the Sonia junta’s continued silence on the May 2009 Mullivaykkal massacres, a savage human tragedy of huge proportions (40 000+ civilians mercilessly killed within the span of a few days) in which the Sonia junta trio had a major role. Readers are also aware that Delhi opposes the initiatives of the international community to bring the ‘kolaiveri’ Rajapakses before the ICC for its massacres of civilians and war crimes in which the Sonia Delhi’s hands are stained as well.
Hence recently a ‘kolaiveri Sonia junta member urged SL to implement the autonomy measures for Eelam Tamils written into the 13th Amendment under the 1987 Indo-SL Accord (please see the statement of 25 December 2011, Vishnu Prasad of Delhi’s External Affairs Ministry in the context of the release of the LLRC report) not measures to enforce SL’s accountability for the massacres, the human rights and war crimes. The Sonia junta’s involvement in the massacres are sound grounds for Delhi’s fear of the Rajapakses implicating the Delhi ‘in the loop’ trio and Delhi’s stilled silence which invited the following candid comments in a reputed media report; ‘(in) urging resettlement and normal civilian life, India continues to avoid the issue of accountability and justice..India takes note of the assurance given by the Government of Sri Lanka in Parliament about implementation of many of its (LLRC) recommendations’. A tamed Sonia apologist for the LLRC is Hariharan. Please see his piece in the latest SAAG issue.
A weak Sri Lanka in the 1980’s under battlefield pressure from the Tamil rebels accepted the autonomy clauses (now retracted by SL) in the Indo-SL Accord which after the elimination of the Tamil rebels Delhi is only able to urge SL to implement. SL also conceded then allowing the IPKF into SL as mercenaries to meet Rajiv’s commitment to eliminate the Tamil rebels. In 2011 Delhi stopped at urging implementation of those Indo-SL Accord clauses; the difference is the absence of the Tamil rebels’ military pressure on SL that invited an analyst to observe, ‘Sonia Delhi junta in dutifully delivering on Rajiv’s mercenary commitment under the 1987 Indo-SL Accord suppressing the Tamil resistance encouraged SL to use the China threat to lock out Delhi in finding a fair solution to the Tamil issue’. A locked out Delhi could only urge SL and do no more. This pathetic regional standing of Delhi is the consequence of Delhi partnering SL in eliminating the Tamil rebels.
Colombo in the 1980’s desperately pleaded with Delhi for armed support to survive but now slights Delhi’s every move on the Tamil issue. Delhi is forced to accede to Colombo’s demand to diplomatically support SL against moves to bring it before the ICC. The blunt message to Delhi was delivered in June 2011 at the conclusion of a visit of the Indian delegation led by Shankar Menon. The message was delivered in the one-to-one meeting with Menon that SL President demanded. Thereafter much of the noise that Delhi customarily made over the Tamil issue stopped abruptly and replaced by the ‘stilled silence’ of Delhi that SL also demanded.
Details explaining the unavoidable ‘Delhi’s Sonia junta’s ‘stilled silence’ are given in ‘DELHI MORE ALARMED THAN COLOMBO OVER MULLIVAYKAL (M’KAl) MASSACRES AND SRI LANKA (SL) WAR CRIMES’, in Ground Report August 07, 2011. A more recent Ground Report of 23 December 2011 ‘WILL UTTAR PRADESH VOTERS END THE UPA2/CONGRESS DECEITS IN MAHATMA CONGRESS DHARMIC GARB’ is more graphic in exposing the mafia UPA2/Congress masquerading behind Mahatma Congress name. The mafia values that Rajiv Congress adopted allowed the Sonia junta’s ‘kolaiveri’ trait to gain pre-eminence and run amok causing immense suffering to the Tamils. The UPA2/Congress ‘kolaiveri’ is alien to Mahatma Congress’ thinking. The 23 December report urges Indians specifically the Uttar Pradesh electors not to be deceived by the pretences of the UPA2/Congress that it still is the Mahatma Congress.
Sonia junta’s mafia trait (of which ‘kolaiveri is a part) began with the Rajiv years. Rajiv’s mercenary Indo-SL 1987 Accord packaged his commitment ‘to finish off the Tamil rebels’ with devolution provisions to partially appease the Tamils. According to analysts a series of events that followed Rajiv’s 1987 Accord led to the M”kal massacres. Rajiv’s Indo-SL Accord and the Bofors deals signaled the emergence of a mafia level corruption at the top (PM) levels within the Congress; over time corruption trickled down to the level of ministers (Raja), other politicians, (Kanimozghi) and bureaucrats.
To Mahatma’s Congress, Rajiv’s mercenary deals or scams are as alien as the ‘kolai(kill)veri’ rage of Rajiv evident in Rajiv ordering General Harikirat ‘to kill off’ Prabhaharan an invited guest of the general. Would Mahatma ever have ordered ‘to kill off’ even his opponents in this manner. Indians today view that the Congress scams ‘veri’ are as much or more sinful than the ‘kolaiveri’ of M’kal.
The UPA2/Congress mafia style of relating to the opposition, non-Congress state governments and dissenters reinforces the urgency for improving the awareness of the Indian electorate on the critical difference between the authentic Mahatma Congress and the pedestrian mafia UPA2/Congress. Both ‘kolaiveri’ and scams rage are alien to Mahatma Congress. What started as Bofors scam opened up a can of worms corroding the standards of governance in Delhi/India? The Lokpal a social activist movement was the product of the Indian public’s abhorrence of corruption in UPA2/Congress infecting every level of governance. The scams amounted to a plunder of public assets worth crores and crores by corrupt politicians and bureaucrats depriving the needy (living on Rs 20 a day) of funds which if judiciously applied would have improved the livelihood of the millions suffering poverty in India. UPA2/Congress mafia deals culture urgently needed a monitoring mechanism (a lokpal) to arrest this corruption epidemic tearing apart the fabric of Indian society.
Anna’s campaign despite intense UPA/Congress harassment and ridicule mobilized public opinion into a mighty tide that UPA2/Congress felt deeply threatened. Analysts labeled Anna’s Lokpal movement a second independence struggle thus highlighting the importance of the Lokpal campaign. To protect the illicit millions hoarded or to be hoarded the UPA2/Congress worked fiercely only to concede a ‘phoney’ version of the Lokpal legislation that sailed through the Lok Sabha but UPA/Congress had to abandon it at the Rajya Sabha stage. UPA2/Congress offering an ineffective version of the Lokpal legislation is further evidence that UPA2/Congress is ineligible to claim its lineage to the incorruptible Mahatma’s Congress. The ‘kollaiveri’ UPA2/Congress was dragged screaming and protesting for the Lokpal legislation to reach the Rajya Sabha stage; yet the Congress spokesmen introducing the Lokpal bill claiming that only the UPA2/Congress introduced the first ever Lokpal legislation in India is most amusing.
Are ‘kolaiveri’ and ‘kollai veri’ (plunder lust) the only maladies afflicting the UPA2/Congress rule and India? UPA2/Congress greedy to remain in power and driven by these lust(veri)s resorted to deceitful maneuverings to clear the way for Rahul yuvaraj, a non entity and intellectually (like his father/mother) a non achiever to succeed as the Prime Minister of India. This would be a tragedy for India and not the hallmarks of an emerging democratic world power. Sonia Congress gives Rahul undue advantage projecting/parading him at every state election as the heir apparent with a phoney popular base. In the May 2011 TN state elections this deception was exposed and the Rahul factor miserably failed electorally. Now Sonia is attempting Rahul’s ascendency to PM ship again using Uttar Pradesh once the Mahatma Congress strong hold. Will Sonia’s deceit succeed this time?
The political back stabbing (Pranab/Chidambaram) within the UPA2/Congress is the manifestation of the kolaiveri rage. Did Mahatma ever fight for a dynastic rule in free India? Political consciousness in India sadly allows a dynastic succession phenomenon that is shamelessly flaunted as its democratic trait. Dynastic succession closes off all avenues for fresh talent to enter and improve the quality of the political leadership pool in India.
Hence PM Manmohan Singh with Sonia using her strangle hold on the Congress allows him to serve as a PM only in name. The result UPA2/Congress leadership quality is pathetic. The core leadership apparently are those who succeeded in the back stabbing politics in Sonia Congress; most unhealthy for India. UPA2/Congress alliances with so called secular parties are only to remain in power not to improve the quality of political leadership in India or the Congress. UPA2/Congress dumped the secular Left in 2009 over the nuclear deal with the US. Likewise the secular DMK was entrapped into a scam using the Nadia telephone tapping to unleash its CBI weapon to destroy that party. This is kolaiveri style of Sonia politics.
Despite the bitter experience of its many partners there are parties in UP and elsewhere eager for alliance with Sonia UPA2/Congress. SP whose political credentials are questionable joined up with UPA2/Congress solely to win the UP elections. But a wiser soul like Mamata who unlike the DMK, suspicious of the UPA2/Congress’ intentions hedged her party against the UPA2/Congress scheming to cut into her support base under the guise of a coalition. Only a coalition of the likes of the shrewder West Bengal CM joining forces with Lokpal type activism will be effective in countering the predatory (veri) tactics of the mafia Congress. Educating the UP electorate on the deep mafia trait of the Sonia Congress will lead to the TN level of defeat for the UPA2/Congress in Uttar Pradesh as well.