Will Anna’s Lokpal millions end the sins of UPA2 hurting Indians generally, TN Tamilians and Eelam Tamils?
The much deserved protection the Eelam Tamils desperately yearned for to save their dear lives from the barbaric SL genocide, failed to materialize at the September 2011 UNHRC sessions (thanks for Delhi’s role). A band of human rights abuser states (India leading) ganged up to frustrate the efforts of the civil international community to isolate SL into acknowledging its genocide crimes before changing for the better. SL was indeed most delighted with the recent Perth CHOGM that allowed SL to escape accountability sanctions for its heinous genocide crimes notably the massacres of over 40 000 civilians at Mullivaykal. Delhi that led this gang of human rights abusers earned for the SL genocide much applause at the UNHRC May 2009 sessions while the wider humanity and the UNHRC stood aghast at such a vote. SL is gratified for the whole hearted support of the UPA Sonia junta led by the entrenched anti-Tamil South Block sectarians in Delhi.
The compulsions for Delhi’s stance go back to Rajiv’s years. It began with the Bofors scam that rocked India then; followed by the Jayewardene/Rajiv one-to-one tete a tete that won SL the Indo-SL Accord 1987 and Rajiv’s support to end the Eelam Tamil insurgency. Mercenary considerations swayed the ‘naïve’ Rajiv into supporting the SL genocide not merely to defeat the Eelam Tamils’ fight for basic Tamil rights in SL but the actual reasons (unmentionable) are a puzzle. To fight the Tamil insurgency according to General Harikirat Rajiv ordered the general to kill off Prabhaharan, the Eelam Tamil insurgent leader attending the general’s dinner as guest; not a dharmic Indian gesture. The Delhi junta then began a sustained campaign to demonise the Tamils, its insurgency and leaders as ‘terrorists’. Delhi used the bogey of the strong Dravidian sentiments amongst Tamilians in Tamil Nadu to question their loyalties to India. This cruel line was pushed hard in Delhi by a long line of South Block anti Tamil/Dravidian sectarians beginning with Dixit, Narayanan, SS Menon and now Mathai. Thus began Delhi’s painful step-motherly treatment of TN Tamilians specifically over issues close to the Tamilians’ heart. TN Tamilians had deep set feelings for the sufferings of Eelam Tamils the victims under the SL genocide and the far graver harassment and killings by the SL navy of TN fishermen. The basic protection that India provides to all Indians in most other states was denied to the TN fishermen who risked their lives and livelihood. Thus Delhi abdicated its role as protector of its Tamilian citizens allowing the SL navy to run amok harassing and killing TN fishermen with impunity. Representations by Chennai (CM) to Delhi (PM) found its way into the waste baskets in Delhi. Chennai/Delhi relations were never that cordial which the TN Tamilians reckoned by voting out those who meekly accepted Delhi’s step motherly treatment of TN and their inaction on issues of concern to TN.
The wide-spread restlessness in Tamil Nadu against Delhi’s step-motherly treatment was besides over inaction against SL genocide and harassment of TN fishermen, for Delhi acting as the guardian angel protecting SL from its genocide criminality. This anti-Tamil stance began with the mercenary 1987 JR/Rajiv deal that is in line with other Rajiv’s unresolved mafia Bofors deals that nurtured the corruption culture that afflicts Delhi today. A classic example of the working of this step-motherly Delhi culture was the willful use of allegations of corruption to muzzle Tamil resentment when SL’s genocide atrocities peaked in 2009. Pranab flew down to Chennai specifically to warn the then TN CM under the 2g scam cloud to fall in line with Delhi’s support for the SL genocide to end the Eelam Tamil insurgency, mass massacres regardless.
Sonia (UPA2) assembled junta also opened a new front to totally defeat Tamilians using diplomatic tools focused on demonizing Tamil resistance as terrorism and vigorously defending the state terrorism that was used in the SL genocide in UNHRC (May 2009). The effectiveness of this tool is weakening as information on the SL genocide is entering the public domain fast and the growing commitment of the civil international community to bring SL/human rights abusers to account for genocide crimes (in SL’s case the most cruel Mullivaykal massacres). Here Delhi reasons to continue to deliver on Rajiv’s 30 years old Indo-SL deal Sonia used expensive UPA2 diplomatic resources to totally eliminate the Eelam Tamil insurgency. The international community realized that the Eelam Tamils minus their resistance have become totally defenseless and without any protection and Delhi turning a blind eye on the cruelest form of ethnic cleansing; an inhuman tool to resolve the Tamil issue in SL for good was unacceptable. Delhi stance was to license SL to pursue ethnic cleansing vigorously and swiftly however inhuman it may be. Dispossessing farms to deprive the livelihood for the Eelam Tamils has the blessings of Sonia Gandhi and her loyal junta who ceaselessly urge the helpless Tamils to tamely and silently accept SL oppression terrorizing the Tamils into muted submission.
Sonia’s proxy (an unknown and unelected Rajya Sabha member) Nachchiappan gratuitously urges Eelam Tamils not to protest against SL atrocities and accept ethnic cleansing in SL’s genocide now in full swing as a morally realistic solution. SL uses the Nachchiappan types amongst weakling Tamils urging Eelam Tamils to forget their past pain/sufferings, those killed, dispossed and destitute to participate in the development projects that SL is undertaking in the Tamil areas to benefit from the prosperity that would result. It is amusing that this line is pushed when a well known Nachchiappan type; the UK Defense Secretary Liam Fox who used these same specious arguments turned out to be an arms dealer seeking more contracts from SL. The development projects of Fox in North SL turned out to be a big hoax. Hordes of them are active seeking short term petty profits and pleasures. Fox associates jet setting seeking disgusting pleasures details of which are not that tasteful to elaborate on was also funded by a number of gullible diaspora that were duped. SL has a knack for identifying conmen with unspeakable weaknesses and used them effectively until exposed. There are aplenty of them (many in the South Block tribe) seeking short term gain/pleasure at the expense of a weak community.
S M Krishna’s recent forthright suo moto statement to mislead the Indian parliament follows Nachchiappan’s format effectively selling this line to enable SL to complete its genocide ignoring the international community’s fight for the victims to survive under SL’s reign of terror facing arrests, disappearances, dispossession and denial of livelihood, homeless and destitute all weapons to drive the Tamils out of their homelands. Are these state terrorist measures moral enough for dharmic India (Sonia UPA2) proclaiming Mahatma’s legacy deserve the praise of Delhi?
Despite the mercenary mafia culture that drives Delhi’s policies affecting Tamils in SL and TN, the TN CM has sharply pointed out to Delhi (PM) that the attack on TN fishermen is a national issue and Delhi is duty bound to offer them protection from SL navy. This is a classic Delhi’s step-motherly cruel anti-Tamil stance. Sonia’s UPA Delhi exploited the predicament into which the then DMK TN government was in on account of the 2g scam to get the DMK to muzzle TN Tamilians anger over M’kal massacre to save the ‘in the loop’ South Block trio involved in the M’kal massacres. It is against such corrupted use of power ingrained in the pedestrian UPA2 Delhi that the Anna Hazare’s Lokpal tide is gathering strength giving confidence that the sunset days for the corrupt mafia culture is approaching fast.
Indians are sure to detest a Mafia culture remaining the norm in Delhi at the expense of Mahatma’s legacy rated highly internationally. Indian opinion favours an India that the great Mahatma shaped but lost its way in Delhi in the last eight years. The mustering strength behind Anna and the Lokpal movement is evidence of this. The Gandhi name that politicians keenly sport are so corrupted that the Mahatma prefix needs to be exerocised to disassociate the name Mahatma from being tainted by the sins/crimes that Mahatma would have shunned absolutely yet applauded by the Sonia UPA2.
Had there been a comparable Anna Hazare Lokpal when the Bofors scandal surfaced Delhi would not behave drifted this far from Mahatma’s moral values. Mahatma fought apartheid; hence the moral under-pinnings that drove Indian diplomacy during pre-Rajiv’s years would not have accommodated the excesses of the Rajapakses’ massacres and allowed the Delhi mandarins to articulate the merits of SL genocide in the UNHRC sessions and CHOGM as the Sonia Delhi junta delegates did recently.
According to Gothabhaya, Sonia’s South Block junta (in the loop) involvement in the Mullivaykkal massacres obliges Delhi to sinfully compromise on moral standards to articulate the iconic SL untruths totally denying that any civilians were killed (‘not a single civilian was killed; the Sinhala armed forces …carried a gun in one hand and the Human Rights Charter in the other’) in May 2009. With SL’s iron wall around the genocide massacres leaking profusely evidence of SL’s continuing genocide crimes convinces the world on SL’s atrocities as historical facts. The victims, the Eelam Tamils and humanity owe deep gratitude to Wikileaks, the UN ‘expert panel’, the classic Channel 4 ‘Killing Fields’ documentary and India’s reputed Headlines Today. These were before the delegates when the UNHRC met in September 2011; just in time for the October 2011 CHOGM meet in Perth there was the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) report covering the same ground and suggesting measures to address the CHOGM shortcomings for CHOGM to serve as a vehicle for deterring the growing rampancy of human rights abuses. Delhi SL’s guardian angel acted to deter CHOGM from venturing any further than providing the platform for genuine human rights governments to speak up against the horrors that human rights abusers inflict on humanity.
Delhi acting and speaking as the guardian angel/for genocide SL the international human rights pariah does damage irreparably Delhi’s reputation. CHOGM’s efforts to articulate the pain of the victims of SL genocide was frustrated by Delhi though the evidence against SL on the Mullivaykal massacres was overwhelming. There was too much evidence of SL genocide in the public domain that Delhi did not attempt a repeat of the congratulatory (March 2009 UNHRC) vote for SL massacring over 40 000 civilians in Mullivaykal again in September 2011. It is outrageous that Delhi under the banner of a Mahatma’s India is blessing genocides, massacres and minority oppression while Mahatma strove for ‘truth’ (not the Rajapakse lies), non violence and satyagraha not the bloodthirsty massacres that the mantra chanting South Block Delhi junta partnered. S M Krishna’s suo moto statement to the Lok Sabha recently is morally outrageous by Mahatma’s moral standards. Ranjan Mathai the Delhi CHOGM delegate’s statement caused much disbelieve especially after sighting the UN ‘expert panel’s’ report and Channel 4’s Killing Fields’ documentary.
These point to the devious role Delhi is playing that led the US to have ‘high expectations for the Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission report (US State Department 04 November). to deliver justice to the Eelam Tamil victims instead of using an impeccable institution like the ICC. It is a successful Lokpal that will redress the sins of the UPA2 rule and salvation for all Indians, TN Tamilians, TN fishermen, and Eelam Tamils.
Leave Your Comments